Let our pupil be taught that he does not belong to himself, but that he is public property. Let him be taught to love his family, but let him be taught at the same time that he must forsake and even forget them when the welfare of his country requires it. - Benjamin Rush, signer of the Declaration of Independence
Questioning Compulsory Education
by Michael Haislip
A brief history of compulsory education
Somewhere during the late nineteenth and early twentieth century, the idea arose that it was morally imperative to provide public-funded education to children. With this being America, anything that is morally imperative quickly becomes legally imperative. Thus, compulsory public education was forged in the cauldron of the progressive social movements of previous centuries.
Early on, public education was simplistic, focusing on basic language and math skills. Much of America was still agrarian, and in those rural areas, education wasn’t nearly as important as knowing how to pick cotton or how to harness a mule. Compare that to today’s prevailing opinion that public education is an unassailable right of every child, as if God himself had descended from the clouds to decree, “All children shall attend kindergarten. And quit using my name in vain, goddammit.” What were the forces behind that shift of focus? How did we end up with the current decaying education system?
Wealthy industrialists–the Fords and Rockefellers and Morgans—were the primary forces behind the current system. Along with these businessmen, progressives such as Frederick Taylor, father of the social efficiency movement, and Horace Mann, the cheerleader of compulsory education, pushed governments and industry to model their schools after the Prussian model of education. The Prussian model was a massive state-run school system that churned out obedient workers, soldiers and citizens. A small percentage of children attended realschulen (real school), where they learned to be the supervisors of the masses. The remaining attended volkschulen (people’s school), where they learned how to be obedient and how to fit into the militaristic Prussian society It succeeded, eventually morphing into the Nazi Germany school system.
The system was fascist in nature, and all people were viewed as tools of the state. According to John Taylor Gatto, New York City Teacher of the Year from 1989 to 1991, “after 1900 the new mass schooling arenas slowly became impersonal places where children were viewed as human resources." Gatto continues, "human resource children are to be molded and shaped for something called ‘The Workplace,’ even though for most of American history American children were reared to expect to create their own workplaces.” Gatto wrote again in the Las Vegas Review-Journal that “virtually every single one of the founders of American schooling had made the pilgrimage to Germany, and many of these men wrote widely circulated reports praising the Teutonic methods.”
It is foolish to think that schools are anything other than training camps for patriotic, working Americans who love the flag, pay their taxes and support their troops. Public school advocate John Dewey, a major influence during his day, gave a number of speeches outlining his and others’ hopes for education:
- “Anyone who has begun to think, places some portion of the world in jeopardy.”
- “The teacher always is the prophet of the true God and the usherer-in of the true Kingdom of God”
So, what is the purpose of compulsory education? It is a system to mold children into obedient tools of the state.
The state of American education
I recently read in the paper that my former high school will begin classes on August 5th. Doing some quick calculations, I figured that gives the students 2 months of summer vacation—8 weeks. That’s less than a semester to recuperate from a coerced 8 to 3 routine with no pay. It’s as if I locked someone in a room for seven hours a day, never compensated him, made him believe that the experience was a reward in itself, and told him it was all for his own good. That’s what public school has become.
Somewhere along the way, the original Prussian principles became so engrained into society that no one had to consciously focus on them. They had become habit, and, thus, they had become entrenched to the point of dogma. In America circa 2004, questioning the necessity of compulsory schooling is akin to making fun of cancer victims. The American student no longer works toward self-sufficiency, but instead hopes that Corporate USA will bless him with a job. Why don’t high schools teach more business classes or encourage entrepreneurship? Why are students told that they will be worthless if they don’t earn a diploma? People have developed a master/slave mentality, just as the original planners had hoped. It is learned permission seeking, and it makes students obedient citizens. Students must ask permission to perform a basic biological function--using the bathroom. Students must ask permission to check out of school early. Students must ask permission to walk in the halls. Students can’t even take an aspirin without teacher supervision, as if there is a pandemic of aspirin abuse. Remember, kids: no talking, no gum chewing, no asserting basic freedoms.
Ask a teacher about why their job is important, and you’ll receive moralistic answers about helping kids, making a difference or other save-the-world crap. They never mention the pay check, the long summer vacation or other perks. The average rookie teacher salary in 2001 America was a respectable $30,000 according to the American Federation of Teachers. The average vacation time for a teacher is 4 months per year. Sounds like one hell of a desk job to me.
The latest innovation in many school systems is “year-round schooling,” which is a cute euphemism for “we own your children while our teachers earn more money.” Back to my old high school – the local school system has been shortening summer vacation for years. They take a few days here, a few days there, and make up some bureaucratic reasons why it is necessary. Gradually, vacation time has decreased from 3 months during my younger days to the current length of 2 months. If the trend continues, kids will be attending school year round. Teachers and administrators are ecstatic about it. Although I’m sure the teachers appreciate a long summer vacation, they are not getting paid for it, either. Let’s assume a teacher makes the average beginner’s rate of $30,000 per eight month school year ($3750 per month). Add another 3 months to the work schedule, and that rookie teacher now makes $45,000 a year—and extra $15,000 each year. No wonder we have such a nationwide push for increased school years. More time in school means more money in teachers’ pockets.
The massive government-business-education complex has created ways to force student compliance. Student’s freedom of movement is now being threatened by many states in the form of No Pass/No Drive laws. In order to keep students from exiting the coercive public education system, states will withhold licenses from dropouts. In even more extreme cases, state politicians in various states have proposed that students not meeting certain GPA and attendance requirements should be denied the right to freely move about and associate. I quote from Missouri House of Representatives bill HB 1698:
“Driver's license applicants under age 18 must show high school enrollment, attendance rate greater than 85%, and minimum GPA of 1.75 or satisfactory progress in alternative education program.”
Yes, if someone wants to leave the government education monopoly, the politicians will do everything in their power to stop him. God forbid anyone try to learn on their own.
The aftermath
What have been the results of compulsory education, a concept now over 100 years old in America? What has happened to the targets of this bureaucratic weapon of mass control?
Albert Einstein wrote of his school experience:
"One had to cram all this stuff into one's mind, whether one liked it or not. This coercion had such a deterring effect that, after I had passed the final examination, I found the consideration of any scientific problems distasteful to me for an entire year... It is in fact nothing short of a miracle that the modern methods of instruction have not yet entirely strangled the holy curiosity of inquiry; for this delicate little plant, aside from stimulation, stands mainly in need of freedom; without this it goes to wrack and ruin without fail. It is a very grave mistake to think that the enjoyment of seeing and searching can be promoted by means of coercion and a sense of duty."
Einstein wrote the preceding passage early in the twentieth century. Almost 100 years later, the situation has progressively worsened. Rather than being excited about new developments in science, philosophy and technology, the products of compulsory education shun such topics. For years, students were taught that science was something read about in a textbook with no practical influence in their lives. Students were taught that philosophy was something that only ancient Greeks studied. Instead, we should be teaching children to inquire about the nature of the universe, to question the common knowledge, and to forge their own philosophies. Mindless regurgitation of facts and zombie-like adherence to rules are the paramount concerns of public education today.
Occurrences of mental disorders among children have increased. Schools are breeding grounds for depression, paranoia, social anxiety disorder and numerous other problems. Is it any wonder? Children are thrown into a pressure cooker of hormones, social expectations and government regulations with very little guidance. Those students with a genetic predisposition to mental disease will undoubtedly increase their chance of developing the disease. According to the National Institute of Mental Health, “in 1996, more teenagers and young adults died of suicide than from cancer, heart disease, AIDS, birth defects, stroke, pneumonia and influenza, and chronic lung disease combined.” 1996 is the most recent year for which suicide data is available. When asked why they are considering suicide, the depressed youths often cite social isolation, bullying at school and numerous other school-related issues. For something that is supposed to benefit society, it seems to be failing miserably.
The body of the coerced student suffers as well. Due to constant social jockeying and sexual tension between the sexes, schools inflict a steady low-to-mid level stress upon students, which causes the body to secrete cortisol, a stress response hormone. Increased levels of cortisol eventually lead to serious health problems, such as heart disease, cancer and a diminished immune system.
Clearly, public school is a threat to public health. I suggest we quarantine it until further notice.
What to do about it
Let me suggest the two following options for those disaffected with the current system.
1. Start home schooling
As a response to the worsening intellectual suppression in public schools, home schooling has emerged as a viable alternative for progressive parents. Rather than ship their children to concrete holding pens, home schooling parents take direct responsibility for their children’s knowledge. Home school allows children to learn in a comfortable, non-competitive environment, an environment without social ladders or stifling rules. Home schooling is a return to the pre-compulsory days, when children learned more in five years than most adults learn in twenty years of public school.
2. Drop out
If you are still in school, the simplest (yet most drastic) way to quit the system is to physically quit the system. Don’t like school? Get a spine and stop going to school. It is that simple. If you are in high school, go and get a GED. You won’t spend nearly as much time, and there is no practical difference between a GED and a regular diploma. The key in these scenarios is to spend your energy building alternative systems that benefit you. People do not need school. They can--and do—learn on their own. Walk away. Ignore them. Exercise civil disobedience. Be your own person.
“And what is a good citizen? Simply one who never says, does or thinks anything that is unusual. Schools are maintained in order to bring this uniformity up to the highest possible point. A school is a hopper into which children are heaved while they are still young and tender; therein they are pressed into certain standard shapes and covered from head to heels with official rubber-stamps.” -- H.L. Mencken
6 comments:
Good morning dear! My daughter attends public school. That said, she is blessed with parents who don't believe in the system, who could care less about letter grades, who encourage her to respectfully challenge authority and to question EVERYTHING. We are raising a THINKER, no matter that society and yes the school system doesn't want her to think. Our biggest barrier to home schooling is that she is an only child and she wants friends. She is a very independent kid though. She does what she wants and nobody will change her mind (except the gentle guidance of Momma and Daddy, with some threats and screaming along the way, lol) When she is playing with her friends at school she plays what she wants to play, if they want to join her, that's great, if not that's fine too she'll play by herself! We want to raise her to think for herself, be herself, go her own way and yes be a rebel even with the pressure to conform. She does well with it. If she can get through public school and still be a leader, then she will be unstoppable when she gets out in the "real" world. That said, I admire homeschoolers and think that every parent needs to figure out what is best for THEIR children. If parents would be parents and TAKE BACK their children, then the world wouldn't be the mess that it is. Parents aren't parents anymore. They are simply other people who live in the same house with children. As I stated in my blog a few posts back........we must TAKE BACK OUR KIDS, raise free thinking REBELS and teach them to be strong adults.
Have a great day Amy!
sarah
Thanks for your comment, Goodwife! Sounds like you are a homeschooler! Your daughter just goes to school too :) A lot of people follow homeschooling concepts without realizing it, anyone that spends time with their children homeschools, anyone that does not hand over all their responsibilities to someone else is their child's teacher, even school sends homework home, and more and more of that from what I hear! Even school teachers will tell you that an involved parent makes all the difference. My children are very blessed by having each other and I would probably be concerned also for an only child's loneliness. Children do naturally love each other, but one of the homeschool outlooks is that peers offer a very limited range of social development, it is a luxury to have a large number of playmates of the same age, but not a necessity or a very likely scenario in adult life. There are many, many wonderful children and families that do school. I just get tired of so many people acting like learning at home is odd, when it is actually compulsory school that is new and unusual. Full time homeschooling is not for everyone, but full time thinking should be! And you are right, that can be done anywhere!
I guess I should say, Thanks for your comment, Sarah :)
LOL! You are welcome. We have discussed homeschooling many many times and the only child thing is the biggest factor. We also aren't "joiners" we are called antisocial by some and none of us like to get out and get active in the community. Most likely because we have NOTHING in common with "the community". So she wouldn't get social interaction that way. She is very funny about friends. She plays with them at school and such, but knows that she has nothing in common with alot of them. She calls most of the girls at her school "fashion girls" meaning that they are obsessed with hair and clothes and shoes and what not. That totally isn't her thing.
My child is the single most precious gift that God has given me (aside from my salvation) and I take that gift very seriously. It is our goal as parents to raise a responsible, independent child who will stand up for what she believes in and what she knows is right even if she is the only one standing there! I applaud you for having the same goal for your children, even if we may get there in different ways. A woman that I worked with said to me "Do you ever get lonely up there on that pedestal?" to which I replied, "Come on up here, there is plenty of room." My husband and I stand for what we believe in and what is right, no matter the consequences. You can't be wishy/washy! My husband had a situation at work the other day that involved him making a decision to go over his boss's head about something that was happening that was wrong. We discussed it and I told him I would rather him be fired for doing what is right, than to keep his job by doing what is wrong. That is what we strive to teach our daughter.
Ok sorry for the rambling......this is something that I am SO passionate about! lol
Have a great day!
sarah
It is lovely getting to know you, Sarah, and I appreciate the rambling. We sound so similar. Socialization seems to be the most popular concern about homeschooling. I doesn't really concern me much, we get more socialization than I generally desire, because I too tend to need a lot of solitude, my husband also. Kind of funny considering that he and I are products of school for the most part, it is like we suffer from "people burnout". My children on the other hand are always up for socialization, extremely friendly little people for the most part. For awhile we had a sticker on our vehicle that said " Warning, unsocialized homeschoolers on board", but most people didn't get it. They thought we were calling our kids "backwards", but it is quite the opposite, they are much friendlier than I am! The sticker meant.. Beware of getting hugged and appreciated for existing! They put me to shame with their love for others. To teach is to learn.
Ha! That's a funny sticker! My daughter is friendly and so very very funny once she gets to know you. But she is a very very solitary creature as her daddy and I are. It isn't from being an only either, because my husband has 5 siblings and I have one and we are solitary folk.
Enjoy your day, I'm canning green beans!
Post a Comment